Popular Posts
-
When close friends are separated by profession, time and distance but not shared interests how do they keep in touch? In the digital age we ...
-
On the side of our various assignments I decided to tackle the epic War and Peace , just for fun because that’s what th...
About
Powered by Blogger.
Saturday, March 16, 2013
On the side
of our various assignments I decided to tackle the epic War and Peace,
just for fun because that’s what the cool kids do. My goal was to finish the
entire book during the run of Hughie
and I was very excited to achieve my goal.
I have to
admit that I kind of love Tolstoy’s way of presenting the facts and the
different viewpoints of how history is presented in Russia to what really
happened before he dives into the story from the various characters’
perspectives. Except for the second epilogue where he just went on his own philosophical discussion of history and religion that I didn't particularly enjoy. It’s interesting and engaging and makes me enjoy reading about
the war even though I had to get though half the book to get to these beautiful
insights.
It’s funny
but the largest frustration I have with this book is its epic size. I find it
interesting, I enjoy the style it’s written in and although the numerous
characters can sometimes be hard to keep track of (especially switching back
and forth from Moscow to St. Petersburg to wartime to parties in the royal
society to Tolstoy’s own history lessons) I like picking the book up. But when
I look at how far I still have to go when I feel like I’ve been reading for a
lifetime, I get distracted and frustrated. Maybe the quick pace of society now
has transformed my attention span to make it hard to commit to such a long book
or maybe it’s just hard sitting down and reading such a massive book. I did
enjoy getting back into my school phase of highlighting and taking notes again
though. So here are a few of the quotes that stood out to me that I’d like to
share.
“One must be believe in the possibility of happiness in
order to be happy, and now I do believe in it. Let the dead bury their dead,
but while one has life one must live and
be happy!”
“If there were no suffering, man would not know his
limitations, would not know himself.”
“We imagine that when we are thrown out of our usual ruts
all is lost, but it is only then that what is new and good begins. While there
is life there is happiness.”
There were a lot of insights into
religion, the part of free will vs. inevitability that made me think and want
to right a term paper. Questions posed that made we want to dash to the library
and research the war, Tolstoy’s political views and why he wrote the book. The
second epilogue bored me with Tolstoy’s ranting on historians and their own
prejudices skewing the facts and misinterpreting the role the leaders such as
Napoleon and Alexander had on the people of France and Russia. But being the uneducated person that I am when it comes to history I still enjoyed his take on looking at the "facts" in many different lights. He would explain what happened in a battle about how the French would consider it a failure and why, how the Russians considered it a success and why, and what the historians were now saying about it changing the way that it happened at that time. I really found his insight into how history changes over time fascinating. It reminded me of when I was reading McNamara's book when I was working on Last of the Boys and the confusion and lack of accurate data that made it difficult for the men in charge to make decisions. But then once they were in the war and saw that they had gotten themselves too deep into a problem that they could not easily get out of, there was no turning back. And Tolstoy talks about how these Russian generals made decisions, hundreds of orders sent out that never seemed to make it on time, or the plans were never able to be fulfilled because war is unpredictable and doesn't make sense. But then years and years go by and historians write about what happened and what it led to and forget about all the failed plans until history is presented as a succinct timeline of events culminating in war. It become inevitable and the "genius" of Napoleon becomes exaggerated until that this the only way we perceive these events. People look back and question "why didn't the leaders see this coming and plan accordingly?" and forget all the hundred of other things going on and the thousands of possibilities that could have resulted. And I found this insight refreshing. Sometimes we need that reminder that there is more than one way to look at things.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment